<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>depth first search &#187; statistics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.depthfirstsearch.net/blog/tag/statistics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.depthfirstsearch.net/blog</link>
	<description>“We can only see a short distance ahead, but we can see plenty there that needs to be done.&#34;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 13:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>EM for Gaussian Mixtures</title>
		<link>http://www.depthfirstsearch.net/blog/2008/09/10/em-for-gaussian-mixtures/</link>
		<comments>http://www.depthfirstsearch.net/blog/2008/09/10/em-for-gaussian-mixtures/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 22:36:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>JS</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[computer science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ml]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[algorithm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statistics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.depthfirstsearch.net/blog/?p=572</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The next algorithm in my continuing series of short, hackable implementations of common machine learning algorithms is fitting a Gaussian mixture model through expectation maximization. This example follows section 9.2 in Bishop&#8217;s PRML. You can think of this kind of EM as &#8220;soft&#8221; clustering. We assume that the data has clusters, and that the cluster [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The next algorithm in my continuing series of short, hackable implementations of common machine learning algorithms is fitting a Gaussian mixture model through <a href="http://www.depthfirstsearch.net/blog/em/">expectation maximization</a>.</p>
<p>This example follows section 9.2 in Bishop&#8217;s <a href="http://research.microsoft.com/~cmbishop/prml/">PRML</a>. You can think of this kind of EM as &#8220;soft&#8221; clustering. We assume that the data has clusters, and that the cluster that any particular data point belongs to is missing information. It is precisely this kind of hidden information that EM attempts to recover.</p>
<p>You can think of the algorithm as guessing the hidden cluster for each point, then assuming that guess is correct, figuring out what the remaining distribution parameters should be. Then guess again, and recompute. Repeating this process often yields a useful estimate of the hidden parameters, as well explaining the visible data.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.depthfirstsearch.net/blog/2008/09/10/em-for-gaussian-mixtures/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Algorithm</title>
		<link>http://www.depthfirstsearch.net/blog/2008/08/17/new-algorithm-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.depthfirstsearch.net/blog/2008/08/17/new-algorithm-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 16:45:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>JS</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[computer science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[algorithm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statistics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.depthfirstsearch.net/blog/?p=517</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s been awhile since I posted a new algorithm. I&#8217;ve been reading quite a bit on Monte Carlo methods, and in particular Markov Chains. I came across some pseudo code for what the authors of Monte Carlo Statistical Methods call a 2d slice sampler. Check it out! Now I suppose the primary difficulty in defining [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s been awhile since I posted a new algorithm. I&#8217;ve been reading quite a bit on Monte Carlo methods, and in particular Markov Chains. I came across some pseudo code for what the authors of <em>Monte Carlo Statistical Methods</em> call a 2d slice sampler.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.depthfirstsearch.net/blog/slice-sampler-2d/">Check it out!</a></p>
<p>Now I suppose the primary difficulty in defining a slice sampler is in finding good closed forms for the uniform sample bounds.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the result of running the code:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.depthfirstsearch.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/slice.png"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-518" title="slice" src="http://www.depthfirstsearch.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/slice-300x225.png" alt="" width="300" height="225" /></a></p>
<p>The sample distribution adheres fairly closely to the desired distribution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.depthfirstsearch.net/blog/2008/08/17/new-algorithm-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Today&#039;s Misc.</title>
		<link>http://www.depthfirstsearch.net/blog/2008/08/13/todays-misc-60/</link>
		<comments>http://www.depthfirstsearch.net/blog/2008/08/13/todays-misc-60/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 18:07:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>JS</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[computer science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bayesian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statistics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.depthfirstsearch.net/blog/?p=497</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s a figure that keeps mysteriously appearing in presentations. It is a cartoon representation of model evidence (from Bishop&#8217;s Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning), but it seems to often be mistaken for Bayesian model comparison generally.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a figure that keeps mysteriously appearing in presentations.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.depthfirstsearch.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/figure.png"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-496" title="figure" src="http://www.depthfirstsearch.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/figure-300x223.png" alt="" width="300" height="223" /></a></p>
<p>It is a cartoon representation of model evidence (from Bishop&#8217;s <a href="http://research.microsoft.com/~cmbishop/prml/">Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning</a>), but it seems to often be mistaken for Bayesian model comparison generally.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.depthfirstsearch.net/blog/2008/08/13/todays-misc-60/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>With Some Urgency</title>
		<link>http://www.depthfirstsearch.net/blog/2007/09/11/with-some-urgency/</link>
		<comments>http://www.depthfirstsearch.net/blog/2007/09/11/with-some-urgency/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 22:24:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>JS</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bayesian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statistics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.depthfirstsearch.net/2007/09/11/with-some-urgency/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve become increasingly convinced that I need to understand both applied and theoretical Bayesian inference. Since the department offers no courses on the subject (Engineering might, but that will have to wait for another semester), I&#8217;m collecting library books that deal (sometimes tangentially) with the subject. The library has a lot of books that have [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve become increasingly convinced that I need to understand both applied and theoretical Bayesian inference. Since the department offers no courses on the subject (Engineering might, but that will have to wait for another semester), I&#8217;m collecting library books that deal (sometimes tangentially) with the subject.</p>
<p>The library has a lot of books that have one or more of the words Bayesian, statistics, inference or probability in the title.</p>
<p>I picked four at random to start:</p>
<p>1. Basic Principles and Applications of Probability Theory</p>
<p>2. Kendall&#8217;s Advance Theory of Statistics Volume 2B Bayesian Inference</p>
<p>3. Baseyian Core: A Practicle Approach to Computational Bayesian Statistics</p>
<p>4. Foundations of Modern Probability</p>
<p>We&#8217;ll see how it goes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.depthfirstsearch.net/blog/2007/09/11/with-some-urgency/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conjugate Priors?</title>
		<link>http://www.depthfirstsearch.net/blog/2007/06/26/conjugate-priors/</link>
		<comments>http://www.depthfirstsearch.net/blog/2007/06/26/conjugate-priors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 00:55:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>JS</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[computer science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[math]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statistics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.depthfirstsearch.net/?p=286</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m clearing out my draft posts, without actually trying to flesh them out. Anyway, here&#8217;s some questions I&#8217;m thinking about. As you may be able to infer, I&#8217;m trying to teach myself statistics. Natural conjugate priors &#8211; prior has the same functional form as the likelihood. Is there a category theoretical explanation of &#8220;natural&#8221; in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m clearing out my draft posts, without actually trying to flesh them out.  Anyway, here&#8217;s some questions I&#8217;m thinking about. As you may be able to infer, I&#8217;m trying to teach myself statistics.</p>
<hr />Natural conjugate priors &#8211; prior has the same functional form as the likelihood. Is there a category theoretical explanation of &#8220;natural&#8221;  in this context? Things I&#8217;m trying to understand: exponential families, sufficient statistic, natural conjugate prior.Some websites:</p>
<blockquote><p><a href="http://ocw.mit.edu/OcwWeb/Mathematics/18-05Spring-2005/LectureNotes/index.htm">OCW 1</a><br />
<a href="http://ocw.mit.edu/OcwWeb/Mathematics/18-441Statistical-InferenceSpring2002/Syllabus/index.htm">OCW 2</a><br />
<a href="http://ocw.mit.edu/OcwWeb/Mathematics/18-443Fall-2006/LectureNotes/index.htm">OCW 3</a><br />
<a href="http://ocw.mit.edu/OcwWeb/Mathematics/18-465Spring-2005/LectureNotes/index.htm">OCW 4</a><br />
<a href="http://ocw.mit.edu/OcwWeb/Mathematics/18-465Spring-2004/LectureNotes/index.htm">OCW 5</a><br />
<a href="http://ocw.mit.edu/OcwWeb/Mathematics/18-466Mathematical-StatisticsSpring2003/LectureNotes/index.htm">OCW 6</a><br />
<a href="http://ocw.mit.edu/OcwWeb/Mathematics/18-466Mathematical-StatisticsSpring2003/LectureNotes/index.htm"> </a></p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.depthfirstsearch.net/blog/2007/06/26/conjugate-priors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/28 queries in 1.013 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 477/537 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.depthfirstsearch.net @ 2012-02-08 13:06:58 -->
